#1
C
Charlotte6823
OP
We attach photos per SKU and compare against approved PPS.
Third-party inspection caught label language mismatch before containers gated in.
- Is inline QC better than final PSI for electronics?
- Who pays re-inspection after rework?
Appreciate any real-world examples from this board.
#2
M
Mark1999
We added a second inspector and the defect rate dropped noticeably.
Our QC checklist is based on AQL 2.5 with a tightened level for critical dimensions.
#3
R
Richard2218
Following this thread; our experience aligns with yours.
Timeline slipped once, but proactive updates from the supplier made it manageable.
#4
D
Daniel8027
Agree on documenting everything in the PO appendix.
We also request carton drop tests and keep photos in our QMS folder.
#5
A
Andrew5192
Good question. In our case the forwarder clarified it within 48 hours.
For payment terms, we never go 100% upfront with a new vendor.
#6
O
Olivia1022
Agree on documenting everything in the PO appendix.
Timeline slipped once, but proactive updates from the supplier made it manageable.
Tagging you here for visibility.
#7
R
Richard2218
Not sure about your HS code, but our broker used a different chapter heading.
Our QC checklist is based on AQL 2.5 with a tightened level for critical dimensions.
Tagging you here for visibility.
#8
C
Charlotte9025
Not sure about your HS code, but our broker used a different chapter heading.
Happy to compare notes offline if you share your category.
8 posts in total
Post a reply
Sign in to join the discussion. Be respectful and help build a welcoming community.
Sign in to reply